Downsizing, cost cutting, re-aligning to new  realities, survival, new business models … 2009 has offered so many  challenges to which process owners might have provided not only answers  but solutions. And on the whole they have failed: 
Failed in that we’re still spending an unacceptable amount of time on process discovery 
Failed in that we’re still insisting that automation is a type of management 
Failed in that we’ve still not understood that processes either create or destroy value 
Failed in that we’re still thinking that any improvement of our internal  processes will automatically lead to improved customer processes 
Failed in that we’ve still not understood the difference between process projects and process operations 
Failed in that we’ve not linked processes to business strategy 
Failed in that still we’re using the term ‘process’ as a figleaf to cover functional orientation 
Failed in that we’re ignorant of how changing circumstances affect processes 
Failed in that we’ve refused to hold process owners accountable for the mess they are administering 
Failed in that 20 years after the first big reengineering wave and 10  years after BPM became fashionable to talk about, we have still not  managed to create a process mindset 
And we’re still wondering why senior management refuses to believe in  the value of processes – other than as a theoretical concept? I dare  anyone to explain how all the nice sounding process predictions for 2010  a la cloud, SaaS, green processes, BPM 3.0 etc. will make things any  better if we first don’t adress the basic issues we’re facing. Looking  to the future is one thing but without learning the lessons from the  past (http://bit.ly/7fMaAY) the future will just pass us by. 
(Sorry about this rant, it’s been a good year from a business and  personal perspective, so no complaints there, but I really thought that  2009 would have pushed BPM to a new/higher level of contributing to  business excellence) 
Thomas